keycloak and devise compare

Keycloak vs Devise: Which Authentication Solution to Choose in 2025?

When building authentication for your application, choosing the right solution is crucial for security, scalability, and maintainability. Two popular options are Keycloak and Devise. In this blog, we’ll compare them in-depth, covering use cases, features, and which one fits best for your project.

What Are Keycloak and Devise?

  • Keycloak: An open-source identity and access management solution developed by Red Hat. It supports OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML, and Single Sign-On (SSO) across multiple applications.
  • Devise: A flexible authentication solution built for Ruby on Rails. It provides user authentication out-of-the-box but is primarily focused on Rails applications.

Comparison Table: Keycloak vs Devise

FeatureKeycloakDevise
TechnologyStandalone Identity Provider (Java-based)Ruby on Rails Gem
Authentication ProtocolsOAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAMLNone (Works with Rails only)
Single Sign-On (SSO)✅ Yes❌ No
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)✅ Yes❌ No (Requires extra gems)
User Management UI✅ Yes (Admin Console)❌ No (Requires custom admin panel)
Multi-Tenancy Support✅ Yes❌ No
Token-Based Authentication✅ JWT, OAuth TokensJWT (Custom implementation)
Integrations with Multiple Apps✅ Yes (Works across web, mobile, and APIs)❌ No (Rails-only)
Scalability✅ High (Designed for enterprise-scale)⚠️ Limited (Best for small/medium apps)
Security Features✅ Role-Based Access Control (RBAC), Federated Identity, LDAP Support⚠️ Basic authentication, requires extra gems for RBAC

Key Differences Explained

1. Support for Multiple Applications Across Different Platforms

If you need authentication for multiple applications (e.g., React web app, Flutter mobile app, and Node.js API), Keycloak is the better choice. It allows centralized authentication using OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect, meaning users can log in once and access all apps.

Example:

  • A company has a web app (React.js), a mobile app (Flutter), and a Node.js API.
  • Using Keycloak, users log in once, and all these apps share authentication.
  • If the company used Devise, they would need to manually build an authentication API, issue JWTs, and handle token refresh logic.

2. Security & Compliance

Keycloak has built-in MFA, SSO, and role-based access control (RBAC). This is important for companies requiring GDPR, HIPAA, or SOC 2 compliance. Devise lacks these features out-of-the-box, requiring extra gems and custom logic.

3. OAuth 2.0 & OpenID Connect vs. Plain JWT Authentication

Many developers think JWT alone is enough for authentication, but authentication protocols like OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect provide:

  • A secure way to obtain tokens (avoiding token theft and replay attacks).
  • Token revocation and refresh mechanisms.
  • Federated login support (Google, Microsoft, LDAP, etc.).
  • Better security against session hijacking and CSRF attacks.

Using raw JWT without a proper authentication protocol can expose security risks.

When to Use Keycloak?

✅ If you need SSO, OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, or multi-app authentication.
✅ If your application is scalable and used by many clients (web, mobile, APIs).
✅ If you require MFA, federated identity, or LDAP support.
✅ If security and compliance (SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA) are a priority.

When to Use Devise?

✅ If you are building a single Ruby on Rails application and don’t need multi-platform authentication.
✅ If you want a simple authentication solution with minimal setup.
✅ If you are comfortable managing authentication logic and security manually.

Final Verdict

Choosing the right authentication solution depends on your app’s requirements. If your project is growing, consider Keycloak for better scalability and security.

Post Comment